On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 00:45 +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote: > On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 16:02 -0500, jam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 03:44:58PM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > On Friday 01 December 2006 15:40, Frank S. wrote: > > > > like an extra cd with all the warnings. > > > > > > Because often times that is illegal. > > > > > > > a valid point-- however users want these things and if it's "too difficult" > > to get them installed and operational they will go elsewhere. like the > > original poster, I applaud the idea of sticking to the guns and not shipping > > any "grey" content, but that does *not* solve the problem for the vast > > majority of potential fedora users, and the matter needs to be addressed > > rather soon if we want to have a serious set of desktop users. > > > > regards, > > J > > > > Addressed how? > IANAL, but AFAIK any attempt to make gray content distribution easier > (E.g. Press here to download illegal X) makes you an accomplice in the > distribution of illegal content X. > "lobby-buddy" - a helper app similar to "bug-buddy", but tries to detect what country and electoral region you're in, what the legal issue is, and lets you easily generate a letter to the appropriate elected representative? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
