Re: Static linking considered harmful

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Olivier Galibert (galibert@xxxxxxxxx) said: 
> Ok, so glibc maintains backwards compatibility only for bug-free
> programs.  Show of hands, who has a bug-free program around?

Of course we maintain it for programs that actually use the API
the way they're intended.

Here's an example - we had a bug filed once (this was years ago) about
how someone's app was segfaulting when they tried to execute a helper
program. Why? Because they weren't null-terminating the arguments
to execl()!

They pressed, and pressed - "this worked in RHL 4.2 - you need to support
this!". But, realistically, if your code only worked by accident, you
can't expect it to be supported eternally.

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux