Re: Reducing Fedora memory footprint?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>> 1) with RHL73 (w/ fvwm2), the battery lasted for 3.5-4.5 hours.
>>>    With FC5 or FC6 (with xfce), it lasts for 1.5 hours, even if the
>>>    computer is "idle".  Either ACPI is a lot worse than APM, or
>>>    something is going on.  Any ideas how to debug this?

> Also, back in 7.3 time the kernel probably had HZ=100, and now it is
> usually 250 or 1000.  Slow laptops may not get back to sleep at all between
> ticks.

'hald' polls all CD and DVD drives to detect when a disk is inserted.
I see about 9 interrupts per second per drive.  For example on common
x86 clone boxes with CD as /dev/hdc or /dev/hdd (and no harddrives there):
   grep ide1 /proc/interrupts; sleep 10; grep ide1 /proc/interrupts
hald ought to have a settable parameter to control this.
Until then: try putting a disk into the drive(s), or kill hald-addon-storage.

-- 

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux