Re: Can we make readahead more robust to package updates?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 I've created a new project page for readahead (with jkeating's
 help:-). It's fine if you edit the wiki page and contribute there.

  http://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/readahead/

 Note: GIT repo will be available next week.

        Karel

On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 01:57:57PM -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> Okay its come to my attention that the readahead configs have a
> difficult time being kept in sync as package updates roll out. For fc6
> right now for example readahead is out of sync with firefox libraries.
> 
> Can we update readahead's implementation so we can get per package
> control of the default configs?  Is a readahead.d/ structure
> appropriate here?
> 
> 
> I want to point out that we lose significant value with read-ahead if
> we can't ensure that the listings will be in-sync as package updates
> are issued.  And re-spinning readahead updates periodically to attempt
> to sync a centralized config file is horrible inefficient and may
> never be perfectly in-sync considering the churn of updates during a
> release cycle.
> 
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203329
> 
> 
> -jef
> 
> -- 
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux