Re: Static linking considered harmful

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:34:14AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> actually static linking DECREASES that portability !!

On which planet ?

galibert@xxxxxxxxxxxx:~/git/mmconfig #2 >git grep acpi_table_mcfg_config
git: error while loading shared libraries: libcrypto.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
galibert@xxxxxxxxxxxx:~/git/mmconfig #3 >cat /etc/redhat-release 
Fedora Core release 5 (Bordeaux)

T'was compiled on a 32bits fc3, shared, and I tried to use it on a
x86-64 fc5.  It is *extremely* hard to be sure that you have all the
compatilibity libraries for the previous versions of fc.

Missing shared libs is the #1 portability problem in heterogenous
environments.  Glibc "I hate static linking" shenanigans are a far
away second.

  OG.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux