Re: Static linking considered harmful

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrice Dumas writes:
 > On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 05:08:00AM -0500, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
 > > Hi!
 > > 
 > > We should more proactively discourage static linking in FC7+, for
 > > reasons for that see
 > > http://people.redhat.com/drepper/no_static_linking.html
 > > 
 > > Removing libc.a would be most effective, but I'm afraid we still need
 > > a handful of statically linked binaries for boot time initialization and
 > > system recovery utilities.
 > 
 > Not only. There are cases when all those issues are moot, a prominent one 
 > being for numerical models. Compiling models statically makes it possible
 > to run them on any other linux (including different fedora version) box 
 > without recompiling. So all the libraries that can be used for numerical 
 > computations should have static libraries kept.

This seems like a non sequitur.  What's special about numerical
computations?

Andrew.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux