On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 09:33 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 11:28 +0000, Richard Hughes wrote: > > On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 06:16 -0500, buildsys@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > * Fri Nov 17 2006 Adam Jackson <ajax@xxxxxxxxxx> 2.3.0-1.fc7 > > > - Update to 2.3.0 from upstream. > > > - Add nouveau userspace header. > > > > Hey, looking good. What's the consequence of this? We can start hacking > > nouveau[1] easily? Or am I getting excited over nothing? > > That too. Or, if you just want to run it, you can do that too ;) > > The nouveau driver requires a DRM component in the kernel (the good > kind, not the RIAA kind), which I have more or less merged and am really > just waiting for the kernel to be in a buildable state before pushing to > rawhide. That was my next question :-) > After that piece lands, the xorg-x11-drv-nv package will > install two drivers, nv and nouveau, similar to the i810/intel bundle. > As mentioned later in the thread, nv will still be the default. Is this what upstream us going to do, i.e. what's the benefit to doing this, rather than just including a new package xorg-x11-drv-nouveau? > So basically, if you want to work on nouveau, all the source and all the > buildreqs will already be set up for you. Yay! If instead you just > want to try it and compare, you can do that too. Also yay! Legend, thanks. Richard. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
