Pete Zaitcev writes: > On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 09:23:14 +0000, Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Does Sun JDK build for PowerPC? > > > > > > Nope but its potentially possible now. > > > > I don't really understand this remark. "Potentially possible?" What > > does this mean? That we can write a Java VM for the PowerPC? But, of > > course, that was always true. It's not as though we needs access to > > the source of a VM for some other arch before we can write one. > > So, if "we" "can" write one, why haven't we? > > I don't understand what your point is. Are you, personally, going to > package JDK for PPC? Are you stenously object to someone else packaging > JDK for PPC? If neither, what are you wasting the bandwidth about? It's a question. I didn't understand Rahul's remark. I still don't. > So Rahul's wording was not perfect, big deal! > > By the way, surely you know that VMs are dime a dozen, and the > libraries are the real problem. I might have some knowledge of that. > I am quite happy with my gcj and Classpath, which execute my > critical Java applications today, but there are still people out > there would would benefit from (compatibility with) all bugs in Sun > JDK libraries. Excellent. Andrew. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
