Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11/13/06, Otto Rey <otto_rey@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > +1 Include Sun JDK in Fedora > > +1 Move Gcj to Extras > > > > > > From: Warren Togami <wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Keep in mind that bits don't land until March 2007. > Keep in mind that any such actions will have to be in a post fc7 > timeframe if Warren's statement is correct and the re-licensed code > isn't publically available until March 2007. A detailed discussion as > to what to do is a bit premature until we have the re-licensed code in > hand. I really think it would be a bad idea to rely on a promise to > re-license, to make technical decisions which could impact the fc7 > release. Its enough to know everyone is aware about it and the > timescales involved. Work on gcj can't stop if Sun's relicensed > release isn't available soon enough for the fc7 testing timeframe. Besides, at least to me it isn't clear (yet?) they are GPLing everything you'd need to /use/ Java in anger... Also, gcj is a native compiler too, it could very well be that filling in the rough spots from Sun's Java is the way to go in the end. -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 2797513 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
