Re: Can we make readahead more robust to package updates?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 13:57 -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> Okay its come to my attention that the readahead configs have a
> difficult time being kept in sync as package updates roll out. For fc6
> right now for example readahead is out of sync with firefox libraries.
> 
> Can we update readahead's implementation so we can get per package
> control of the default configs?  Is a readahead.d/ structure
> appropriate here?
maybe.
the downside is that you now add extra costs (seeks :) which.. well
readahead was trying to avoid. So if this is going to get used massively
it's less certain things will gain as much as before...

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux