On 11/12/06, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Okay its come to my attention that the readahead configs have a difficult time being kept in sync as package updates roll out. For fc6 right now for example readahead is out of sync with firefox libraries. Can we update readahead's implementation so we can get per package control of the default configs? Is a readahead.d/ structure appropriate here?
Sorry... i didnt look hard enough... the readahead.d structure was added for fc6.... the problem is package maintainers aren't using it yet. I guess what I need to do is parse the existing config file... identify individual packages that could drop files in readahead.d/ and poke the appropriate maintainers in the eye about dropping a file in there as part of package payloading. Anyone want to help me construct the list of packages that could make sure of readahead.d/ on a per package basis based on the default readahead configs we have right now? -jef"First up... the firefox maintainer... where's my eye poking stick"spaleta -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
