Re: Testing Fedora - small (?) suggestion.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2006-11-11 at 14:10 +0100, Benny Amorsen wrote:
> >>>>> "JS" == Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> JS> -jef"Every single iso image deadline in that mock up that you
> JS> expect to pass through release engineering will slip by a
> JS> week..garunteed. You want a to see 8 milestone isos.. that 2
> JS> months of delay associated with any strawman schedule. Hold your
> JS> breath."spaleta
> 
> Would it be possible to automatically detect when the rawhide tree is
> in shape for installation, and then spin an ISO? I bet it would mean
> some broken ISO's in the beginning, but hopefully the automatic
> problem detection would be improved over time.

with something like KVM (kvm.sf.net) you could do fully automatic ISO
spinning, and then do a trial install automated into the virtual machine
(using kickstart) that then could "phone home" when finished.
It's a good QA thing, and it's a first step towards more frequent/more
reliable iso spins, but it's not a substitute for humans doing trial
installs/freezes :(

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux