On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 19:30:39 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > Dnia 09-11-2006, czw o godzinie 05:52 -0500, buildsys@xxxxxxxxxx > napisał(a): > [..] > > control-center-1:2.17.1-3.fc7 > > ----------------------------- > > * Wed Nov 08 2006 Matthias Clasen <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> - 2.17.1-3 > > - Work around a file conflict with libgnomekbd (#214608) > > Still in %post, %postun, %preun is registered/unregistered > desktop_gnome_peripherals_keyboard_xkb.schemas. > > BTW introducing new schema for register/unregister schema files. > IMO new schema is to complicated and still not guarantee produce always > correct schamas database. Current template looks: > > %post > export GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=`gconftool-2 --get-default-source` > gconftool-2 --makefile-install-rule \ > <list_of_package_schemas> > > %pre > if [ "$1" -gt 1 ]; then > export GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=`gconftool-2 --get-default-source` > gconftool-2 --makefile-install-rule \ > <list_of_package_schemas> > fi > > %postun > if [ "$1" -eq 0 ]; then > export GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=`gconftool-2 --get-default-source` > gconftool-2 --makefile-install-rule \ > <list_of_package_schemas> > fi > > In case not registering in previous release some packages some new > schemas this still do not prevent fixing this kind bugs. > Probably better will be regenerate each time schemas database. > IMO better/simpler schema for registered/unregistered can look only > like: > > %post > GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=`gconftool-2 --get-default-source` \ > gconftool-2 --makefile-install-rule \ > /etc/gconf/schemas/*.schemas >& /dev/null > > %postun > GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=`gconftool-2 --get-default-source` \ > gconftool-2 --makefile-install-rule \ > /etc/gconf/schemas/*.schemas >& /dev/null > > Yes .. regenerate schemas database takes longer time but will guarantee > schamas database correct content. > > kloczek Where's --makefile-uninstall-rule with your system? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
