Re: I think, rsh is quite obsolete

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> said:
> Telnet client is invaluable, server maybe not so much. Legacy Cisco
> equipment and other networking gear makes some of the stuff useful but
> when it comes to it none of it is enabled by default and its not like
> they take up tens of megabytes on the installer CDs.

Also, for both telnet and rsh, the client and server come from the same
source tarball/SRPM.  The telnet-server RPM is 36K and the rsh-server
RPM is 40K; what are you trying to save by dropping them?  Packaging
either server for Extras would just take the same SRPM and build only
the server and not the client (while Core would use the same SRPM and
build only the client).
-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux