On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 11:50:51AM +0100, Adam Tkac wrote: > I think, It's no argument to include rsh in next versions of fc/rhel. > OpenSSH could successfully substitute this component. SSH is more secure > than rsh and has all features of rsh. Do you think anything else?? Don't break traditional UNIX compatibility when there is no good reason to do so. Rsh and friends (rexec, rcp) are used in more legacy UNIX scripts than you think. I don't know or these are part of POSIX.* or some Open Group standard (I don't think so, as these commands originates from the BSD-world). -- -- Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx> -- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364 -- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
