On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 15:47 +0000, Tim Waugh wrote: > On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 10:25 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: > > The Xorg server is perfectly capable of running headless, just configure > > it to use the dummy driver. > > I think the point is that VNC users are used to having a single 'Xvnc' > binary they can run, which is a bit like Xvfb but you can connect a VNC > viewer to it. > > As far as I can tell, this isn't trivial with x11vnc (but maybe I'm > reading the FAQ incorrectly). > > Tim. > */ Yes, I've checked that x11vnc isn't good choice. I want discuss idea that Xvnc won't be big single binary package like now. They're many ways how it could be done and I want find the best way (performance and maintaining aspects). I think, vncserver isn't xserver but only "moderator" between vncviewer and xserver (virtual or psychical) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
