Re: vncserver in future dists

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Adam Tkac schrieb:
> I'm going to port x11vnc
> (http://www.karlrunge.com/x11vnc/) project as default vncserver in
> future dists. Current vncserver has self xorg-server and this is
> argument for x11vnc. When main xorg-x11-server package is patched,
> patches must be ported to vnc now. vncserver might be only "layer" on
> xorg-x11-server and have dependency for it. Maintaining of vnc could be really easy.. What do you think
> about it?? Is this bad idea??

Does it require special support in the X drivers? It might be a bit
problematic to use with proprietary drivers if the answer to that
question is "yes" (*1)

Cu
thl

(*1) -- I remember I once used the stuff documented at
http://www.realvnc.com/products/free/4.1/x0.html for testing purposes on
Fedora and noticed that it did not work together with the proprietary
fglrx drivers from ati. :-/ Proprietary drivers really suck...

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux