On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 11:10 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Gilboa Davara wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 22:34 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > >> On Thursday 26 October 2006 22:26, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >>> By that logic, package selection shouldn't be allowed either and the > >>> installer should just install everything. Users are allowed to deselect > >>> what they don't need, why shouldn't this include 32-bit multilibs? Let's > >>> face it, there are users who _don't_ need or want them. > >> And those users that actually care can remove them easily enough. > >> > > > > Yeah, but you are asking us to install literally hundreds of packages > > and MB we don't need and then spend hours removing them. > > > > If the price of solving this problem is one check box or one "additional > > yum parameters" text box - why not do it? > > > > Suggestion, maybe make this an anacondo install paramater which can be > passed through syslinux then sufficiently advanced users can get an > x86_64 only system and normal users are not confused by a checkbox? > > Regards, > > Hans Baaah. If a checkbox might confuse users (Lookie! Shiny thing!), then this option should be hidden under "Advanced options" in the package selection UI. - Gilboa -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
