Jesse Keating wrote: > On Friday 27 October 2006 04:05, Hans de Goede wrote: >> And (gee surprise) even here on the mailing list again noone responded >> to my serious and motivated suggestion, that sucks and leads me to >> believe that rpm (the foundation of our beloved distribution) is >> currently an unmaintained piece of crap. Is it really? Does really no >> one care about rpm?? > > No, it means our rpm maintainer hardly has time to read every message posted > to a very noisy fedora-devel list. There is a devel list for rpm, there is > bugzilla. Both are far better avenues than more noise on a very noisy list. > > I make it part of my job to keep an eye on a few different Fedora lists, > watching for issues that may effect large amounts of userbase and making sure > we get them fixed or looked at for release blockers. Its part of my job. > The same cannot be said about other developers within Red Hat. This is why > things like bugzilla are better since that _is_ part of their job. > You forgot to quote the part of my message with the bugzilla link, this is already in bugzilla! I'm making noise about it on this list because I want this to get some attention, and doing so through bugzilla has sofar failed! Regards, Hans -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list