On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 11:35 -0400, Christopher Aillon wrote: > I was about to complain that people were clamoring for this without > hearing out my opinion for precisely the reason you just stated. I'm > less grumpy, so thank you for the consideration, Gawain. I really do > appreciate that. No worries, I figured early on I wouldn't get far stepping on your already overworked toes ;-) > - There is potential for a maintainer to accidentally or willingly get > Fedora entangled into a legal battle for trademark violations by > including non-approved patches. I haven't looked at the changes made > but essentially if they differ from what I have published, which I'm > guessing they do, they need to be checked. It is basically your FC7 SRPM and patch with a 's/firefox/firefox2/' applied to the name of these files: firefox.desktop firefox.sh.in firefox.1 And finally this patch. --- mozilla/configure.in.firefox2 2006-10-22 11:10:26.000000000 +1000 +++ mozilla/configure.in 2006-10-22 11:10:58.000000000 +1000 @@ -4242,7 +4242,7 @@ ;; browser) - MOZ_APP_NAME=firefox + MOZ_APP_NAME=firefox2 MOZ_APP_DISPLAYNAME=BonEcho MOZ_XUL_APP=1 MOZ_PHOENIX=1 --- mozilla/configure.firefox2 2006-10-22 11:10:18.000000000 +1000 +++ mozilla/configure 2006-10-22 11:10:38.000000000 +1000 @@ -12915,7 +12915,7 @@ ;; browser) - MOZ_APP_NAME=firefox + MOZ_APP_NAME=firefox2 MOZ_APP_DISPLAYNAME=BonEcho MOZ_XUL_APP=1 MOZ_PHOENIX=1 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
