> I don't think it's at all unreasonable to ship with the default document > root at /srv/www, which would be empty by default. If you make anything else > the document root, many people are just going to edit stuff *there*. > > Anyone who wants a different arrangement than the default can edit the > document root in httpd.conf, no problem, but there'd be a sensible and > standard default already. From the FHS: > > Therefore, no program should rely on a specific subdirectory structure of > /srv existing or data necessarily being stored in /srv. However /srv > should always exist on FHS compliant systems and should be used as the > default location for such data. > > What I'm suggesting covers both parts of this, not just the first. Though the current places are also standard for a long time and also covered in many books. Keeping to them and having sysadmins change them to /srv/ might keep FC/RHEL to more conservative setups and stability. regards, Florian La Roche -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
