>No, /srv should exist, but otherwise be empty from the vendor's POV >(e.g. no package should own/place anything beneath /srv). We should >neither impose /srv/<service>, nor /srv/<service>/<domain>, nor >/srv/<domain>/<service> methods. Well, let me point out that SE Linux policy needs to know what is going in that location so that "the right thing" happens. We do need to impose some kind of order so that people don't bump into MAC problems and turn SE Linux off. -Steve __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
