Re: mono vs exec-shield

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 09:49:09AM +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
 > On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 12:37 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
 > > Alexander Larsson (alexl@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
 > > > Further information from the reporter seems to say that it only affects
 > > > xen kernels (dom0), on all cpu:s but opterons. Very strange stuff.
 > > 
 > > ... including x64? Or is it just on 32-bit?
 > 
 > >From the bug:
 > 
 > Opteron box, x86_64 kernel 2.6.18-2798, x86_64 mono 1.1.17-3: works
 > Opteron box, x86_64 kernel 2.6.18-2798xen, x86_64 mono 1.1.17-3: works
 > Opteron box, i686 kernel 2.6.18-2798, i686 mono 1.1.17-3: works
 > Opteron box, i686 kernel 2.6.18-2798xen, i686 mono 1.1.17-3: works
 > EM64T box, x86_64 kernel 2.6.18-2798, x86_64 mono 1.1.17-3: works
 > EM64T box, x86_64 kernel 2.6.18-2798xen, x86_64 mono 1.1.17-3: works
 > EM64T box, i686 kernel 2.6.18-2798, i686 mono 1.1.17-3: works
 > EM64T box, i686 kernel 2.6.18-2798xen, i686 mono 1.1.17-3: SEGFAULT
 > Athlon box, i686 kernel 2.6.18-2798xen, i686 mono 1.1.17-3: SEGFAULT
 > Pentium 4 box, i686 kernel 2.6.18-2798xen, i686 mono 1.1.17-3: SEGFAULT
 
Sounds more like a Xen bug than an execshield bug.
File a bz against kernel-xen.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux