Re: feedback: fc5 and fc6t3 x86_64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 11:00:37PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 October 2006 19:28, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> > Should this be included by default for x86_64 ?
> > user joe won't figure it out like this.
> 
> Absolutely not.  An end user's multilib capable machine + OS should install 
> the multilib software by default.  An end user shouldn't have to figure out 
> how to add it after the fact.  It should Just Work(tm) for the user.  There 
> should be no problem with the x86_64 and i386 packages being installed.  If 
> there are, like multilib file conflicts, we fix them.

Is it true for Extras? I haven't seen anything like a push for multilib
in extras, for example there is nothing in the guidelines, nor something 
reporting the conflicts. Did I miss something?

--
Pat

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux