>> On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 10:45:34AM +0200, Joachim Frieben wrote:
>> >
>> > I have been using "epiphany" as my default browser for more than 2 years,
>> > and I really wonder why the standard "GNOME" web browser still isn't
>> > installed as the default application.
>>
>> When all this Iceweasel debate exploded, I decided to give Epiphany
>> another shot. I've been using it as my default browser for the last
>> three weeks now and I've been very impressed. It needs a few more
>> extensions and I'll keep using Firefox for web developpement but
>> Epiphany is much better integrated and easier to use than in the Gnome
>> desktop than Firefox.
>>
>> +1 for me.
+1 for me.
>
>As a long time Epiphany user I would love to see it as the default
>browser, with the extensions pack you even get all the nice little
>things like adblocking (okay currently not compiled by default but
>that's an rpmbuild away)
>
>+1 from me as well
+1 for me.
>
>> > No need to include "firefox" in the base install. It could (should) even be
>> > moved to "extras" then.
>>
>> +1 again.
>
+1 for me.
>Once XULRunner is ready firefox would just just another UI for the
>engine, it could easily be moved to Extras. However as it stands right
>now we need it in Core because half the desktop depends on it for gecko.
>
>-1 now, +1 post XULRunner
>
>- David
>
>
>> >
>> > I have been using "epiphany" as my default browser for more than 2 years,
>> > and I really wonder why the standard "GNOME" web browser still isn't
>> > installed as the default application.
>>
>> When all this Iceweasel debate exploded, I decided to give Epiphany
>> another shot. I've been using it as my default browser for the last
>> three weeks now and I've been very impressed. It needs a few more
>> extensions and I'll keep using Firefox for web developpement but
>> Epiphany is much better integrated and easier to use than in the Gnome
>> desktop than Firefox.
>>
>> +1 for me.
+1 for me.
>
>As a long time Epiphany user I would love to see it as the default
>browser, with the extensions pack you even get all the nice little
>things like adblocking (okay currently not compiled by default but
>that's an rpmbuild away)
>
>+1 from me as well
+1 for me.
>
>> > No need to include "firefox" in the base install. It could (should) even be
>> > moved to "extras" then.
>>
>> +1 again.
>
+1 for me.
>Once XULRunner is ready firefox would just just another UI for the
>engine, it could easily be moved to Extras. However as it stands right
>now we need it in Core because half the desktop depends on it for gecko.
>
>-1 now, +1 post XULRunner
>
>- David
>
>
Preguntá. Respondé. Descubrí.
Todo lo que querías saber, y lo que ni imaginabas,
está en Yahoo! Respuestas (Beta).
Probalo ya!
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
