>>>>> "Patrice" == Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> writes: >> We might revisit that idea in a few weeks if the devel/fc6 bits all >> look good and stable, but it's a reasonably large undertaking to >> update everything and gets the plugins and core bits in sync, etc. Patrice> I, personally don't think it is worth having xfce 4.4 in Patrice> fc5. Too much work and too much risk of breakage for little Patrice> gain (I switched back and forth and I didn't saw much Patrice> difference, except now there are icons but I don't use xfce Patrice> for that ;-). However it should be good to have 4.4 Patrice> 'specific' apps in fc5, like exo, Terminal, thunar and so on Patrice> (if they aren't there allready and there are no missing deps, Patrice> of course). Yeah, I can look at doing that at some point... although some of those (Thunar in particular) might need newer libraries. Patrice> -- Pat kevin
Attachment:
pgphO6H2nHKtH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
