Re: Xfce 4.4 call for testing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 06:48:39PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Patrice> That's equally bad. What about 'xterm -e vi' ;-). This should
> Patrice> certainly be reported upstream.
> 
> Well, I guess it's up to packagers to decide what those should be and
> make sure dependencies are installed.

Indeed, but an editor as preferred app set in exo would make much sense,
that's that which I think should be reported upstream.

> It's needed for some of the plugins. Some of them have not had
> official releases for 4.4 yet, so there are only svn snapshots.
> You need xfce-dev-tools in order to build any of the svn snapshots.

Ok, makes perfect sense. (I was fearing an dangerous use of 
autotools...)

--
Pat

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux