Re: NVIDIA dkms srpms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le mardi 03 octobre 2006 à 21:46 +0100, Richard Hughes a écrit :

> Now, I'm aware I've broken two big packaging rules, that SRPMs shouldn't
> download files, and that SRPMs shouldn't be interactive. I seem to
> remember jpackage doing something similar with java a few years ago,
> where there was only a SRPM available and you had to download a large
> tar.gz file.

What jpackage did is no-source java srpms, meaning you have to download
the legally-questionable blob to rpm SOURCES dir yourself before
starting the no-downloads srpm build process. Also the srpm scripting
killed the annoying interactive click-to-say-you've-read-the-license
part of the sun blob decompression process. So jpackage is both
non-interactive and no-downloads in the build phase

Find some other excuse ;)

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux