2006/9/27, Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx>:
It's not "new", it used to be included in Extras.
Actually it's because the guy who removed it thought it was obsoleted by OSS emulation modules - which is NOT.
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 11:54:50AM -0500, Fibonacci Prower wrote:
>
> Actually including it instead of letting it be reviewed forever by two guys
> - who seem to be the only ones who visit the BugZilla page.
Ahem. Please have a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/NewPackageProcess
and the links within (to Guidelines) to have a idea on the inclusion in fedora
extras process. You are welcomed to contribute to the review of this package.
There is a rigorous Quality Assurance done for new packages, they are not
included based on an arbitrary decision.
It's not "new", it used to be included in Extras.
If you dig a bit in the wiki you'll see that any activity on the review
bugzilla ticket is sent to a list read by all the fedora extras contributors.
And there's also the PackageStatus page which lists stalled reviews such that
people can look at these, and procedures for stalled reviews in case you
xant to start a fresh one for the same package.
If the package isn't in extras, it's because it hasn't attracted enough
interest to be submitted/reviewed. The rule is that there have to be 2
people sufficiently interested, the submitter and the reviewer.
Actually it's because the guy who removed it thought it was obsoleted by OSS emulation modules - which is NOT.
--
Pat
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
--
Eye halve a spelling chequer, it came with my pea see
It plane lee marques four my revue miss steaks aye can knot sea
Eye ran this poem threw it - your shore reel glad two no
Its vary polished in it's weigh, my chequer tolled me sew.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
