Re: rawhide: 20060921 - problems.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 21:53 +0000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> 
> Actually, it still isn't. You can force all kinds of things by using
> RPM
> directly. Yum, however, will check packages checksum against what it
> has in its
> primary.xml.gz file. For example, here are 3 packages from i386
> repository:
> 
> -------------------------------------
> 1a9e25cd7c81e1ce10e2b73dc47a35eed166a698
> gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm
> 2beb89a8a66dca72833334a83ef2ffc3d1262761  hal-0.5.7.1-3.fc6.i386.rpm
> a7b7fd448a2960c355c039297b070fece73f7521
> hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm
> -------------------------------------

Still:

Downloading Packages:
(1/2): hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jp 100% |=========================| 1.6 MB
00:07     
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum
Trying other mirror.
(2/2): gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1. 100% |=========================|  42 kB
00:00     
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum
Trying other mirror.

The question is: is the header checksum incorrect or the package
checksum incorrect? i.e. is it safe to force the transaction?

Thanks,

Richard.


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux