Please unsubscribe me...
I forgot my password and can't do it
myself...
Thanks.
Re: fedora-devel-list Digest, Vol 31, Issue 51
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 4:42
AM
Subject: fedora-devel-list Digest, Vol 31, Issue
51
> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> fedora-devel-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> fedora-devel-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of fedora-devel-list digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. ctrl-c during boot != good (Dax Kelson)
> 2. Re: ctrl-c during boot != good (Bill Nottingham)
> 3. Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes (Richard Hughes)
> 4. Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes (Pete Graner)
> 5. Re: Keeping the Devel Mirrors Up-to-Date (Ian Burrell)
> 6. Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes (Clyde E. Kunkel)
> 7. Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes (Chris Adams)
> 8. Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes (Clyde E. Kunkel)
> 9. undefined reference to `is_selinux_enabled' (Orion Poplawski)
> 10. Re: Keeping the Devel Mirrors Up-to-Date (Thomas M Steenholdt)
> 11. Re: rawhide report: 20060922 changes (Mike Chambers)
> 12. Re: rawhide: 20060921 - problems. (Bojan Smojver)
> 13. Temporarily Disabling AIGLX? (Peter Gordon)
> 14. Re: Temporarily Disabling AIGLX? (Mark Rosenstand)
> 15. Re: ctrl-c during boot != good (Gilboa Davara)
> 16. Core x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-09-23
> (Matt Domsch)
> 17. Core i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-09-23 (Matt Domsch)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:32:40 -0600
> From: Dax Kelson <dax@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: ctrl-c during boot != good
> To: notting@xxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <1158946360.18703.24.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> SysVinit-2.86-12
> ----------------
> * Thu Sep 21 2006 Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> - 2.86-12
> - set controlling tty for /etc/rc so that ctrl-c can be passed to hung
> services (#184340)
>
> I don't have the permission to read the bug, so I could be interpreting
> this wrong.
>
> You do *not* want users to be able to press ctrl-c during boot up.
> Otherwise they can completely fsck the starting of daemons or commands
> (like remounting / rw), possibly causing a serious security breach. This
> is also a disaster for a kiosk where random malicious joe blows can
> screwup and stop the boot.
>
> I filed a bug circa 1997ish to fix the "can press control-c during
> bootup" problem. Lets not go backwards.
>
> Dax Kelson
> Guru Labs
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 13:49:41 -0400
> From: Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: ctrl-c during boot != good
> To: Dax Kelson <dax@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <20060922174941.GA17495@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Dax Kelson (dax@xxxxxxxxxxxx) said:
>> SysVinit-2.86-12
>> ----------------
>> * Thu Sep 21 2006 Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> - 2.86-12
>> - set controlling tty for /etc/rc so that ctrl-c can be passed to hung
>> services (#184340)
>>
>> I don't have the permission to read the bug, so I could be interpreting
>> this wrong.
>>
>> You do *not* want users to be able to press ctrl-c during boot up.
>> Otherwise they can completely fsck the starting of daemons or commands
>> (like remounting / rw), possibly causing a serious security breach. This
>> is also a disaster for a kiosk where random malicious joe blows can
>> screwup and stop the boot.
>>
>> I filed a bug circa 1997ish to fix the "can press control-c during
>> bootup" problem. Lets not go backwards.
>
> We have multiple requests from people who want to be able to press
> ctrl-c to stop hanging daemons. Note that you can *already* interrupt
> rc.sysinit.
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:52:14 +0100
> From: Richard Hughes <hughsient@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core
> <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <1158947534.26902.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 15:06 -0400, buildsys@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6
>> ---------------------
>> * Wed Sep 20 2006 Alexander Larsson <alexl@xxxxxxxxxx> - 0.8.1-1.fc6
>> - Update to 0.8.1, fixes a leak that caused files to not be closed
>>
>> hsqldb-1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.2
>> -----------------------
>> * Wed Sep 20 2006 Steve Grubb <sgrubb@xxxxxxxxxx> 1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.2
>> - Apply patch correcting tmp file usage
>
> Anyone else getting this:
>
> (1/2): hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jp 100% |=========================| 1.6 MB
> 00:09
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum
> Trying other mirror.
> (2/2): gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1. 100% |=========================| 42 kB
> 00:00
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum
>
> I've tried multiple times in the last few hours, and also tried "yum
> clean headers" and "yum clean metadata" to no avail.
>
> Known issue? Thanks.
>
> Richard.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:50:14 -0400
> From: Pete Graner <pgraner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes
> To: richard@xxxxxxxxxxx, Development discussions related to Fedora
> Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <45143066.2060205@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Richard Hughes wrote:
>> On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 15:06 -0400, buildsys@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6
>>> ---------------------
>>> * Wed Sep 20 2006 Alexander Larsson <alexl@xxxxxxxxxx> - 0.8.1-1.fc6
>>> - Update to 0.8.1, fixes a leak that caused files to not be closed
>>>
>>> hsqldb-1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.2
>>> -----------------------
>>> * Wed Sep 20 2006 Steve Grubb <sgrubb@xxxxxxxxxx> 1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.2
>>> - Apply patch correcting tmp file usage
>>
>> Anyone else getting this:
>>
>> (1/2): hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jp 100% |=========================| 1.6 MB
>> 00:09
>> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum
>> Trying other mirror.
>> (2/2): gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1. 100% |=========================| 42 kB
>> 00:00
>> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum
>>
>> I've tried multiple times in the last few hours, and also tried "yum
>> clean headers" and "yum clean metadata" to no avail.
>>
>> Known issue? Thanks.
>>
>> Richard.
>>
>>
>
> Same here. Started last night.
>
> Pete
> --
> Pete Graner email: <pgraner@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 12:38:44 -0700
> From: "Ian Burrell" <ianburrell@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Keeping the Devel Mirrors Up-to-Date
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora Core"
> <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID:
> <d91f09cd0609221238x36beaa28yb184b6ebb8a9a646@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> On 9/22/06, Thomas M Steenholdt <tmus@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> It would be really nice if there were some good, universal and simple
>> way to see how updated a site mirror is.
>>
>> One approach that I find to be working well is what debian is suggesting
>> for their mirrors ( http://www.debian.org/mirror/ftpmirror ). Not only
>> does this "trace method" provide info on when the mirror was last
>> sync'ed, it also shows the "route" of the mirroring, i.e. what mirror
>> this mirror mirrors from (confusing yet true :o)).
>>
>> Although this does not sort the actual problem of the stale mirrors, it
>> will give people an easy way to monitor their own (local?) mirrors and
>> perhaps even allow people to select a few often-updated near-by mirrors,
>> instead of getting packages from a stale mirror across the ocean.
>>
>
> It is fairly simple to compare the timestamps in the repomd.xml files.
> If the timestamps are older than the master, then the mirror is
> out-of-date. This doesn't help with mirrors which are in the middle
> of syncing or had a failure. Mirrors could use the rsync
> --delay-updates option to make the updates more atomic.
>
> - Ian
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:46:02 -0400
> From: "Clyde E. Kunkel" <clydekunkel7734@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes
> To: richard@xxxxxxxxxxx, Development discussions related to Fedora
> Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <45143D7A.8000008@xxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Richard Hughes wrote:
>> On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 15:06 -0400, buildsys@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6
>>> ---------------------
>>> * Wed Sep 20 2006 Alexander Larsson <alexl@xxxxxxxxxx> - 0.8.1-1.fc6
>>> - Update to 0.8.1, fixes a leak that caused files to not be closed
>>>
>>> hsqldb-1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.2
>>> -----------------------
>>> * Wed Sep 20 2006 Steve Grubb <sgrubb@xxxxxxxxxx> 1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.2
>>> - Apply patch correcting tmp file usage
>>
>> Anyone else getting this:
>>
>> (1/2): hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jp 100% |=========================| 1.6 MB
>> 00:09
>> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum
>> Trying other mirror.
>> (2/2): gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1. 100% |=========================| 42 kB
>> 00:00
>> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum
>>
>> I've tried multiple times in the last few hours, and also tried "yum
>> clean headers" and "yum clean metadata" to no avail.
>>
>> Known issue? Thanks.
>>
>> Richard.
>>
>>
>
> Some kind of problem between usually reliable mirrors and
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/
>
> I used a method seen on one of these lists in the last couple of days:
>
> # rpm -Uvh
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm
>
> then, yum update.
>
> WFM.
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Old Fart
> (my reply-to address is "munged" to defeat spambots)
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:53:09 -0500
> From: Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core
> <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>, fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <20060922195309.GD657887@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Once upon a time, Clyde E. Kunkel <clydekunkel7734@xxxxxxx> said:
>> Some kind of problem between usually reliable mirrors and
>> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/
>>
>> I used a method seen on one of these lists in the last couple of days:
>>
>> # rpm -Uvh
>> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm
>> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm
>
> It appears to be a problem on the mirror master. I just verified my
> mirror is synced and up to the minute (including re-downloading those
> two files), and I still get the same error.
> --
> Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
> I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:54:42 -0400
> From: "Clyde E. Kunkel" <clydekunkel7734@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes
> To: Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>, Development discussions related
> to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>,
> fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <45144D92.8020903@xxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Chris Adams wrote:
>> Once upon a time, Clyde E. Kunkel <clydekunkel7734@xxxxxxx> said:
>>> Some kind of problem between usually reliable mirrors and
>>> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/
>>>
>>> I used a method seen on one of these lists in the last couple of days:
>>>
>>> # rpm -Uvh
>>> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm
>>> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm
>>
>> It appears to be a problem on the mirror master. I just verified my
>> mirror is synced and up to the minute (including re-downloading those
>> two files), and I still get the same error.
>
> Same here...so,
>
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/
>
> is not the mirror master?
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Old Fart
> (my reply-to address is "munged" to defeat spambots)
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:09:07 -0600
> From: Orion Poplawski <orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: undefined reference to `is_selinux_enabled'
> To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <ef1jdp$fqd$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Just trying to build paraview against libOSMesa.so now that it's made
> its return and am getting the following link errors:
>
> /usr/lib64/libOSMesa.so: undefined reference to `is_selinux_enabled'
> /usr/lib64/libOSMesa.so: undefined reference to
> `security_get_boolean_active'
> /usr/lib64/libOSMesa.so: undefined reference to
> `security_get_boolean_pending'
>
> This is against today's rawhide (mesa-libOSMesa-devel-6.5.1-3.fc6).
> Need to explicitly link against -lselinux these days? Should libOSMesa
> be linked against libselinux?
>
> /usr/lib64/libOSMesa.so.6.5.1:
> libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00002aaaaaf53000)
> libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00002aaaab1d6000)
> libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00002aaaab3f0000)
> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000555555554000)
>
>
>
> --
> Orion Poplawski
> System Administrator 303-415-9701 x222
> NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702
> 3380 Mitchell Lane orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:18:14 +0200
> From: Thomas M Steenholdt <tmus@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Keeping the Devel Mirrors Up-to-Date
> To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <ef1jum$hn7$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> Ian Burrell wrote:
>>
>> It is fairly simple to compare the timestamps in the repomd.xml files.
>> If the timestamps are older than the master, then the mirror is
>> out-of-date. This doesn't help with mirrors which are in the middle
>> of syncing or had a failure. Mirrors could use the rsync
>> --delay-updates option to make the updates more atomic.
>>
>
> This does not provide the mirroring trace (which I think would be very
> nice), it also says nothing about whether or not the rest of the files
> have been mirrored or only the repomd.xml file.
>
> /Thomas
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:37:39 -0500
> From: Mike Chambers <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20060922 changes
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core
> <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <1158961059.2552.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 07:39 -0400, buildsys@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> Updated Packages:
>
>> evolution-data-server-1.8.0-9.fc6
>> ---------------------------------
>> * Thu Sep 21 2006 Matthew Barnes <mbarnes@xxxxxxxxxx> - 1.8.0-9.fc6
>> - Revise patch for RH bug #198935 (fix a crash reported in bug #207446).
>
> Evo-2.8.0-6 wasn't included in today's build? Guess tomorrow's or on a
> people.redhat.com site until then?
>
> --
> Mike Chambers
> Madisonville, KY
>
> "Sex is like air, it's not important unless your not getting any!"
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:53:04 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Bojan Smojver <bojan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: rawhide: 20060921 - problems.
> To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <loom.20060922T234458-491@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Naoki <naoki <at> valuecommerce.com> writes:
>
>> Ahh, indeed the RH repo is fine :
>>
>> # rpm -Uvh
>
> Actually, it still isn't. You can force all kinds of things by using RPM
> directly. Yum, however, will check packages checksum against what it has in its
> primary.xml.gz file. For example, here are 3 packages from i386 repository:
>
> -------------------------------------
> 1a9e25cd7c81e1ce10e2b73dc47a35eed166a698 gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm
> 2beb89a8a66dca72833334a83ef2ffc3d1262761 hal-0.5.7.1-3.fc6.i386.rpm
> a7b7fd448a2960c355c039297b070fece73f7521 hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm
> -------------------------------------
>
> However, primary.xml.gz has:
>
> -------------------------------------
> <name>gsf-sharp</name>
> <arch>i386</arch>
> <version epoch="0" ver="0.8.1" rel="1.fc6"/>
> <checksum type="sha"
> pkgid="YES">ffadfbeab23ac7ef2d252ae68930ca4283435129</checksum>
>
> <name>hal</name>
> <arch>i386</arch>
> <version epoch="0" ver="0.5.7.1" rel="3.fc6"/>
> <checksum type="sha"
> pkgid="YES">2beb89a8a66dca72833334a83ef2ffc3d1262761</checksum>
>
> <name>hsqldb</name>
> <arch>i386</arch>
> <version epoch="1" ver="1.8.0.4" rel="3jpp.2"/>
> <checksum type="sha"
> pkgid="YES">e1131397f0919ff1d04c16b5fcb7be6b82891748</checksum>
> -------------------------------------
>
> Two of those three don't match the checksum and yum won't update them. Here are
> the errors:
>
> -------------------------------------
> (5/38): hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3j 100% |=========================| 1.6 MB 00:10
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm:
> [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum
> Trying other mirror.
> (16/38): gsf-sharp-0.8.1- 100% |=========================| 42 kB 00:00
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm:
> [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum
> Trying other mirror.
> -------------------------------------
>
> --
> Bojan
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:10:35 -0700
> From: Peter Gordon <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Temporarily Disabling AIGLX?
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core
> <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <4514B3BB.8070801@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hello, all.
>
> I've not as of yet been able to get Compiz and AIGLX eye-candy working (odd
> since it was working nicely around the FC6T2 time frame). Because of this, AIGLX
> doesn't seem very useful to me, and as I've been having some issues with a few
> SDL/OpenGL apps, I'd like to disable it to test if it is AIGLX or something else
> that is malfunctioning.
>
> I looked through the radeon(4) and xorg.conf(5) man pages with Yelp and found
> nothing useful. A google search returned an earlier post from the X.org mailing
> list from Donnie Berkholz suggesting to add `Option "AIGLX" "off"` in the
> ServerFlags section of the xorg.conf file. Unfortunately, that just results in
> a hardlock when between when RHGB finishes and when GDM attempts to start up.
>
> Any suggestions would be most appreciated. Thanks.
> --
> Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
> GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint:
> DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479
> My Blog: http://thecodergeek.com/blog/
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 251 bytes
> Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
> Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20060922/2c70902c/signature.bin
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 07:40:47 +0200
> From: Mark Rosenstand <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Temporarily Disabling AIGLX?
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core
> <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <1158990047.833.50.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 21:10 -0700, Peter Gordon wrote:
>> Hello, all.
>>
>> I've not as of yet been able to get Compiz and AIGLX eye-candy working (odd
>> since it was working nicely around the FC6T2 time frame). Because of this, AIGLX
>> doesn't seem very useful to me, and as I've been having some issues with a few
>> SDL/OpenGL apps, I'd like to disable it to test if it is AIGLX or something else
>> that is malfunctioning.
>>
>> I looked through the radeon(4) and xorg.conf(5) man pages with Yelp and found
>> nothing useful. A google search returned an earlier post from the X.org mailing
>> list from Donnie Berkholz suggesting to add `Option "AIGLX" "off"` in the
>> ServerFlags section of the xorg.conf file. Unfortunately, that just results in
>> a hardlock when between when RHGB finishes and when GDM attempts to start up.
>>
>> Any suggestions would be most appreciated. Thanks.
>
> I don't think you need to disable it in the server - just either disable
> the compositor in metacity, or in the case of compiz, don't launch it.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 15
> Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 11:18:27 +0300
> From: Gilboa Davara <gilboad@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: ctrl-c during boot != good
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core
> <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <1158999507.19122.29.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 13:49 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> Dax Kelson (dax@xxxxxxxxxxxx) said:
>> > SysVinit-2.86-12
>> > ----------------
>> > * Thu Sep 21 2006 Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> - 2.86-12
>> > - set controlling tty for /etc/rc so that ctrl-c can be passed to hung
>> > services (#184340)
>> >
>> > I don't have the permission to read the bug, so I could be interpreting
>> > this wrong.
>> >
>> > You do *not* want users to be able to press ctrl-c during boot up.
>> > Otherwise they can completely fsck the starting of daemons or commands
>> > (like remounting / rw), possibly causing a serious security breach. This
>> > is also a disaster for a kiosk where random malicious joe blows can
>> > screwup and stop the boot.
>> >
>> > I filed a bug circa 1997ish to fix the "can press control-c during
>> > bootup" problem. Lets not go backwards.
>>
>> We have multiple requests from people who want to be able to press
>> ctrl-c to stop hanging daemons. Note that you can *already* interrupt
>> rc.sysinit.
>>
>> Bill
>>
>
> I second Dax's comment.
> Can you make it configurable?
>
> Gilboa
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 16
> Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 03:42:25 -0500
> From: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Core x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-09-23
> To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <20060923034225.A30049@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Core Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for x86_64 Fri Sep 22 22:20:06 CDT 2006
>
> Note: This is using a reduced set of packages in the build chroot
> starting with FC6test2. See
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/FixBuildRequires for more
> information, including the list of packages removed from the default
> build chroot.
>
> Note: You will need to rebuild your packages in Fedora Extras for FC6
> starting August 28, 2006. See here for more details:
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-August/msg00160.html
>
>
> Total packages: 1156
> Number failed to build: 46
> Number expected to fail due to ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch: 25
> Leaving: 21
> (there may be some duplicates if rawhide has 2 versions of a package)
>
> Of those expected to have worked...
> Without a bug filed: 21
> ----------------------------------
> alacarte-0.10.0-1.fc6
> am-utils-6.1.5-4
> compat-gcc-32-3.2.3-61
> compat-gcc-34-3.4.6-4
> control-center-2.16.0-5.fc6
> file-roller-2.16.0-2.fc6
> gdb-6.5-8.fc6
> gnome-media-2.16.1-2.fc6
> grub-0.97-12
> gthumb-2.7.8-3.fc6
> jakarta-commons-codec-1.3-5jpp.1
> jakarta-commons-pool-1.3-3jpp.1
> kdesdk-3.5.4-2.fc6
> memtest86+-1.65-4.1
> nautilus-2.16.0-4.fc6
> rhythmbox-0.9.5-4.fc6
> syslinux-3.11-4
> totem-2.16.1-1.fc6
> valgrind-3.2.0-5
> xen-3.0.2-36
> yelp-2.16.0-3.fc6
>
> With bugs filed: 0
> ----------------------------------
>
>
> Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/
>
> --
> Matt Domsch
> Software Architect
> Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
> Linux on Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 17
> Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 03:42:34 -0500
> From: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Core i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-09-23
> To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <20060923034234.A30067@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Core Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for i386 Fri Sep 22 22:22:23 CDT 2006
>
> Note: This is using a reduced set of packages in the build chroot
> starting with FC6test2. See
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/FixBuildRequires for more
> information, including the list of packages removed from the default
> build chroot.
>
> Note: You will need to rebuild your packages in Fedora Extras for FC6
> starting August 28, 2006. See here for more details:
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-August/msg00160.html
>
>
> Total packages: 1157
> Number failed to build: 15
> Number expected to fail due to ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch: 10
> Leaving: 5
> (there may be some duplicates if rawhide has 2 versions of a package)
>
> Of those expected to have worked...
> Without a bug filed: 5
> ----------------------------------
> beagle-0.2.10-2.fc6
> jakarta-commons-codec-1.3-5jpp.1
> jakarta-commons-pool-1.3-3jpp.1
> kdesdk-3.5.4-2.fc6
> xorg-x11-drv-via-0.2.1-5
>
> With bugs filed: 0
> ----------------------------------
>
>
> Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/
>
> --
> Matt Domsch
> Software Architect
> Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
> Linux on Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>
> End of fedora-devel-list Digest, Vol 31, Issue 51
> *************************************************
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
