Re: Minimal X Config File and Compiz

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Callum Lerwick wrote:
On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 09:30 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
I'm open to suggestions for better heuristics. Since Gnome is pretty far from ever having a scalable UI, it might be sensible to modify the above heuristic to "if multiple advertised modes match the physical aspect ratio and we're somehow reasonably sure that it's not an LCD, pick the one that comes closest to 100dpi". It's that reasonably sure part that's tricky. Alternatively we could get gdm to randr to a "sensible" size, but that just moves the problem to gdm, plus introduces a flicker for the resize event.

Err. A better sanity check IMHO is to choose the highest resolution that
doesn't put the refresh rate under ~72hz.

Of course, you might not get any modes that fast. But if you do that's not a bad secondary criteria.

The other problem is that X really doesn't provide a way to RANDR _up_. The initial mode is the largest mode you're ever going to get. You can set a smaller initial mode with a large virtual, but that means you get pan and scan, and no one likes pan and scan. So while I certainly want to fix that eventually, for now it means I'd rather pick a mode that's slightly too large.

I'll try the refresh rate idea on a few CRTs and see how well it works.

- ajax

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux