I am a loyal "epiphany" user too, and yesterday I tried out "gnash" by installing "gnash-0.7.1-7.fc6.i386.rpm" and "gnash-plugin-0.7.1-7.fc6.i386.rpm".After closing all "epiphany" windows and opening a new one, "about:plugins" showed the "gnash" plugin in the very first line. The plugin actually does something on a "flash" animated web page although not quite what it is meant to do ... Anyway, it was not a matter of not getting picked up at all. The "gnash" plugin lives in the same "/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins" directory as the other plugins, e.g. installed by "totem". My system is a "rawhide" system as of 2006-09-03. I hence assume the problem is related to your particular setup. > I wasn't suggesting changing the directory as such, I merely wondered > if we had a standard (defacto or otherwise) since it did not appear > that way when actually checking if the plugins were picked up in > Epiphany. > > I'm happy to see that we do infact have an unofficial standard, now we > are still stuck with some issues. I take it since something like the > gnash plugin does install in the correct place not being picked up by > Firefox is a bug then? > > - David -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
