Re: yum question, reverting to old packages.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Richard Hally <rhally@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 13:32 -0400, Richard Hally wrote:
> >> So maybe we should remove --oldpackage/--nodeps/--force from
> >> rpm. It follows the gnome 'dumb it down' approach.
> > No, we just don't enable these functions in the "helper" apps.  We
> > don't
> > want to help you ruin your system, we'll let you do that on your own
> > with RPM.
> >
> Excellent! RPM considered harmful. Of course our "helper" apps are not
> helpful when you need help the most. </sarcasm>
> 
> Sorry Jesse, perhaps in trying to improve the design of yum or rpm we
> need to think in terms of reversibility so that updates are not
> 'forward only'. When considering improvements we need to think about
> robustness and recoverability.

Patches are more than wellcome.

Note that this means making sure that /all/ packages abide by the rules and
are set up for downgrading. Just too bad that that is exactly what is least
tested...
-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica                     Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria              +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile                Fax:  +56 32 797513

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux