On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 12:49:30PM -0500, Jay Cliburn wrote:
> Maybe I should've just kept my mouth shut about the whole thing, because
> it now looks like there are *two* 1106:0591 lines in the 2.6.18-rc4-mm3
> version of drivers/ata/sata_via.c. It doesn't seem to cause any harm,
> though, since I'm running rc4-mm3 on the system right now.
Patch is good at that
>
> This patch removes one of the dupes.
>
> [jcliburn@osprey kernel-2.6.18-rc4-mm3]$ diff -u
> linux-2.6.18-rc4-mm3/drivers/ata/sata_via.c
> linux-2.6.18-rc4-mm3-work/drivers/ata/sata_via.c
> --- linux-2.6.18-rc4-mm3/drivers/ata/sata_via.c 2006-08-31
> 16:21:40.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6.18-rc4-mm3-work/drivers/ata/sata_via.c 2006-08-31
> 18:13:24.000000000 -0500
> @@ -80,7 +80,6 @@
> { 0x1106, 0x0591, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, vt6420 },
> { 0x1106, 0x3149, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, vt6420 },
> { 0x1106, 0x3249, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, vt6421 },
> - { 0x1106, 0x0591, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, vt6420 },
> { } /* terminate list */
> };
>
> To whom should I submit the patch that fixes this, or, more generally,
> who is the correct recipient for patches in the new drivers/ata tree?
>
jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx and cc akpm@xxxxxxxx for -mm bugs (and linux-kernel)
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
