"pdftex/pdflatex" is great but not sufficient, as many "tex" files need plain "latex" to get compiled. Moreover, I hardly imagine moving "tetex-xdvi" to "extras" whereas other "tetex-*" packages stay in "core". I have had a look at "gtkdvi". It relies on "glib/gtk+" which have already been moved to "extras", so no luck either! A "dvi" viewer is certainly needed in core as many doc files currently are "dvi" files. Forget about "gv". This is used by people who adopted it maybe 10 years ago and never got aware of alternatives. And it's in "extras", too. I have rebuilt "evince" with "dvi" support, and it's not that bad! I suggest to enable "dvi" support by default to encourage user feedback for fixing open issues with it. > > It depends. One can use pdftex/pdflatex instead of tex/latex so that > DVI viewers (and gv, dvips) are not needed in this case as the PDF is > the only output. The dvips + gv way isn't always too smooth and I have > to say that xdvi is still the best dvi viewer despite of its age. > > If the most of the teTeX users accepts the usage of pdftex tools, then > moving at least some of the dvi tools to Extras makes sense. > > Jindrich > -- > Jindrich Novy <jnovy@xxxxxxxxxx>, http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ > (o_ _o) > //\ The worst evil in the world is refusal to think. //\ > V_/_ _\_V > > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
