Rahul schrieb: > Steve Barnhart wrote: >> Well Ok I'd like to some people for their actual dissection of what >> the problems were. I guess I don't work in production environments >> (not that Fedora is even for that??) and didn't realize so many users >> hatrid of YaST. I've always found it pretty simple to use but maybe >> that's just me. At least reasoning was given..hopefully the team can >> atleast add some more system-config-* programs or something. > > Are you or any of the Yast fans willing to work on porting and packaging > it in Fedora? Regardless of how many other people dislike it if people > work on it and get into Fedora Extras following the guidelines nobody is > going to oppose that. I'm not so sure in this regard. I think I would oppose that a bit. Not a general veto, but I'd would like to have a general discussion first if having Yast (or similar Tools) in Fedora really is a good idea. I think it might not be a good idea because I suspect it could lead to bad interactions with our normal configurations tools, RPM-Packages and (startup)scripts and therefor could do a lot of harm and confusion to our users. But that would depend on the quality of the port -- and that does not exist yet. So it's a theoretical discussion and all speculation at this point of time. CU thl P.S.: there was a port of yast to debian in the works, but that's stopped "due to lack of time/resources." http://yast4debian.alioth.debian.org/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
