On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 19:12 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > I disagree with that timeline. That's not very nice for Motif library > users. Doing such a change without previous notice, with openmotif > and lesstif being available at the same time for only one month > and only in devel seems wrong to me. It is well known that lesstif > has has issues openmotif don't have, and that many users use the > motif library internally. > > In my opinion it would have been much better to ship openmotif > during FC6. The -devel packages conflict but the packages with libs > don't, so it would have been much easier for users to sort issues > out. We can't in good concience continue to ship a package that doesn't meet our licensing requirements. "Because its useful" isn't a good enough reason. We've been talking about the audit and blogging about it and etc.. for a while now, we're sorry if you haven't been paying attention. It needs to happen and it WILL happen. We're giving some leeway by not nuking it immediately. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
