Hans de Goede wrote:
For a patch as trival as this it should be picked up real soon. But it
looks wrong that PCI ID seems completely unrelated form the other via
sata ID's whereas the others are somewhat consecutive numbers. Are you
sure you've got the right ID (iow the ID for the sata controller
function of the southbridge?)
I'm positive the device ID is correct.
[root@hawk ~]# lspci -v -s 00:0f.0
00:0f.0 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8237A SATA 2-Port
Controller (rev 80) (prog-if 8f [Master SecP SecO PriP PriO])
Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8237A SATA 2-Port Controller
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 64, IRQ 82
I/O ports at dc00 [size=8]
I/O ports at d880 [size=4]
I/O ports at d800 [size=8]
I/O ports at d480 [size=4]
I/O ports at d400 [size=16]
I/O ports at d000 [size=256]
Capabilities: [c0] Power Management version 2
[root@hawk ~]# lspci -n -v -s 00:0f.0
00:0f.0 0101: 1106:0591 (rev 80) (prog-if 8f)
Subsystem: 1106:0591
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 64, IRQ 82
I/O ports at dc00 [size=8]
I/O ports at d880 [size=4]
I/O ports at d800 [size=8]
I/O ports at d480 [size=4]
I/O ports at d400 [size=16]
I/O ports at d000 [size=256]
Capabilities: [c0] Power Management version 2
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
