-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jesse Keating wrote: > On Sunday 27 August 2006 09:58, Arjan van de Ven wrote: >> and this is a problem... why? >> In principle the naming of disk devices shouldn't matter, with >> mount-by-label and the hal fstab changes.... >> >> this kind of asynchronous naming is going to get more and more >> prevalent, both due to linux changes in parallel hw discovery and the >> increasing asynchronous nature of hardware in general... so we better >> have the OS ready to deal with that (and afaik FC5 and later are) > > IIRC this breaks dmraid. > I use device-mapper-multipath. - -- Jean-Luc Fontaine http://jfontain.free.fr/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE8b3KkG/MMvcT1qQRAoQuAKC1z3NammiQodKxYs5E3JoLroFabACfUwsL /LB1MgDf38kGElAyafkpfjg= =ud14 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
