On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 23:31:18 +0200 Erwin Rol <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Trever L. Adams wrote: > > No, we don't. Do a yum clean metadata and then try to reinstall. It > > works fine for me on all machines where I did that as was mentioned > > yesterday by one of the developers. > > > > Trever > > > > On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 17:02 -0400, Louis Garcia II wrote: > >> updated today 08/25/06 and think we have a conflict with > >> glibc-kernheaders obsoleting kernel-headers which is a new package. > > I have a ping pong between glibc-kernheaders and kernel-headers. When i > do a yum update it installs kernel-headers and uninstalls > glibc-kernheaders, if that is done an i run yum update again it installs > glibc-kernheaders and uninstalls kernel-headers, and so on. You need to do a 'yum clean metadata' *first*, then do a 'yum update', then everything will work properly without a 'ping pong' effect. It was posted yesterday in this message: From: Dennis Gregorovic <dgregor@xxxxxxxxxx> To: Fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx, Fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx Cc: Subject: yum metadata cache cleaning needed for next development tree Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 23:51:30 -0400 Reply-To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Sender: fedora-devel-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 (2.6.3-1.fc5.5) A bunch of the packages in the FC development tree were resigned today. You will want to run "yum clean metadata" before using tomorrow's push. Sorry for the inconvenience. -- Dennis -- The greatest productive force is human selfishness. -- Robert Heinlein
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
