Hello, I have opened many bugs asking for creation of -devel packages for some packages that don't have one but ship static library, headers or .so links. I have filled some others to have the .so links go in -devel subpackages and not main package. I only looked at packages that are on my computer, so I am likely to have missed some, feel free to post bugs too ;) I tried to avoid asking creation of -devel package or move of .so when it didn't make sense, but I may have filled bogus bug reports anyway (especially when a .so is required in main package as the library is dlopened, and the library is versioned! it may happen although it is ugly). I can give the list of bugreports if somebody is interested. I didn't do a bugreport for gjdoc, since a .so may be needed for java. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
