On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 10:57 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 16:54 +0200, dragoran wrote: > > Jesse Keating wrote: > > > > > > Doesn't this seem backwards to you? Have anaconda run through, do all the dep > > > checking, pull all the packages down and install them, then remove half of it > > > (redoing dep checking), get a new list of packages to install, dep check > > > again, download some more, and then install again? > > > > > > > > what about adding a nomultilib boot option to anaconda and document it > > in the release notes? > > -> problem solved > > adding options everywhere does not, in fact, solve the problem. > In my eyes, multilib is a part of the package selection and should be controllers by it. I fail to see why adding i386 packages (or removing them) is any different then wanting to add/remove any other package. > It just complicates code maintenance. > Yeah... but the same can be said against any new feature. * > -sv > Gilboa * And I should know, I use every-time someone tries to force some useless feature down my throat... ;) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
