Re: rawhide report: 20060817 changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gilboa Davara wrote:

Looks like we have a fork brewing anyway.

Rahul

Internal to Fedora/RH or a complete fork?


Preferably a cross distribution coordinated fork like Xorg.

A little background on what happened.

Jonathan Corbet of LWN pointed out a license incompatibility

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2006-August/msg00220.html

I forwarded this mail to Fedora Advisory Board list since the Red Hat counsel is in that list

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2006-August/msg00201.html

LWN article (subscribers only for another week) explaining the details at http://lwn.net/Articles/195167/

Tom Callaway is doing a licensing audit initiated by a previous Fedora board discussion (https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2006-August/msg00227.html) of non-free and software with licensing issues in Fedora and filed a bug report against cdrtools pointing out this issue

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202526

There are few potential forks here such as

http://www.arklinux.org/projects/dvdrtools

For FC6, the idea is to go back to the last known good source and stick with it till we figure out the plans better.


Rahul


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux