On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 04:06:43PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > Leszek Matok schrieb: > >Dnia 15-08-2006, wto o godzinie 09:27 -0400, Jesse Keating napisał(a): > >>(...) all kinds of weird hacks to how they are (...) > >>Arguing over which ugly ass hack to apply to be able to package kernel > >>modules is a bikeshed argument. > >[...] > >So, kmdls are the next step. > > Kernel-Module packaging is already working, defined, agreed on by FESCo > and used in Fedora Extras. See > http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/5/i386/kmod-em8300-0.15.3-6.2.6.17_1.2157_FC5.i586.rpm > for example. The same scheme is used in lvn -- nobody reported problems > with it there. I'm reproting problems and I wrote a ton of information about the problems. Don't I count? > But Axel thinks the scheme FESCo invented (in round about half a year of > work) is broken and he thinks his scheme is better. Is that wrong to think? And I'm trying to get better tools in the hands of Fedora developers. Is that wrong, too? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpPMgWmbtjJz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
