On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 09:27 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > Arguing over which ugly ass hack to apply to be able to package kernel modules > is a bikeshed argument. I'm not necessarily suggesting that we shouldn't have an agreed method of building kernel module packages at all -- just that we shouldn't have any such packages in Core or Extras. There _are_ relatively sane (and legal, unlike nvidia/ati stuff) cases where one might want to build a separate module -- like the NTFS modules in Livna, for example. And other 'new drivers' which aren't yet upstream. Of course you're right when you agree with me that those new drivers shouldn't be in Core or Extras -- but that doesn't mean we shouldn't provide a way to package them at all. So I think it _is_ worthwhile having the debate about how kernel module packages can be done -- I just don't think it's worth getting _particularly_ worked up about. -- dwmw2 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
