Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Jesse Keating schrieb:
On Monday 14 August 2006 08:01, Erwin Rol wrote:
Wow you had a serious bad weekend , didn't you ?
The CAPS is a direct quote from the mailman page. Thorsten was
helpfully select/inserting the content from the mailman page into the
email. The caps aren't his.
thx Jesse for this clarification. Yes, that was quoted from the list
info page.
Than sorry for the remark, no offense meant.
But it seems the people don't get the differences between fedora-devel
and fedora-test list. Mostly not their fault AFAICS. We IMHO need to
make the differences more clear. I'd vote for a special
fedora-development-tree-list to make it more obvious, but I know
people won't like yet another mailinglist (fedora-test-list could stay
and handle updates-testing stuff for stable releases). fedora-devel
should IMHO stay only for general discussions ("Xorg 7.1 as FC5
update" and stuff like that).
Test and development have kind of blurry edges, maybe my first mail
should have gone to the test-list, but where should the question go on
why GDB and evolution do not play nice ? And what if i not only test,
but also debug (which i was trying to do) ?
Further: The rawhide reports IMHO shouldn't be sendto both
fedora-devel and fedora-test-list because sometimes stuff get
discussed in reply to one list while the same or other stuff gets
discussed on the other. That's confusing. At least a common "Reply-to"
would be helpful so all replies go to one list by default (people can
override it if there is a need to).
Ones again , Thorsten, no offense meant to you personally.
- Erwin
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
