Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis schrieb:
Jesse Keating schrieb:
But it seems the people don't get the differences between fedora-devel
and fedora-test list. Mostly not their fault AFAICS. We IMHO need to
make the differences more clear. I'd vote for a special
fedora-development-tree-list to make it more obvious, but I know
people won't like yet another mailinglist (fedora-test-list could stay
and handle updates-testing stuff for stable releases). fedora-devel
should IMHO stay only for general discussions ("Xorg 7.1 as FC5
update" and stuff like that).
Followup to myself: Or we simply scratch fedora-test-list to get rid of
this problem completely.
No. We need it to announce test updates and QA efforts are going to be
discussed more in the future there.
http://www.redhat.com/about/news/prarchive/
Further: The purpose for fedora-maintainers seems also not completely
clear afaics. It's a nice list to announce stuff to all maintainers, but
sometimes there are discussions held there that in my eyes would be more
suitable on fedora-devel or fedora-extras-list.
Fedora maintainers was created due to the huge amount of unnecessary
noise in this list on various occasions. If a Fedora maintainers
discussion happens that would only apply to Fedora Extras, feel free to
redirect people to the appropriate list.
In general, the "problem" of people discussing development bugs in this
list is not very big as much as random people jumping in with their
opinions on things not related to Fedora development in anyway. We cant
be periodically having a purpose of the list discussion.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
