Hans de Goede writes: > > Andrew Haley wrote: > > Jesse Keating writes: > > > On Friday 11 August 2006 16:29, Andrew Haley wrote: > > > > No. It requires execmem because it really needs it. > > > > > > Then it really needs to be fixed. > > > > It doesn't need to be fixed becasue it's not a bug. We generate code > > on the fly because it's the right thing to do. There's nothing > > special about gcj in this regard: generating code on the fly is not > > unusual, and it's a valid techinique. > > Yes and there are ways to make it work without tripping over selinux's > execmem check, see: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185214#c4 Red Hat Enterprise Linux marks gcj apps and other Java VMs system_u:object_r:java_exec_t. This gives us the permissions we need. Andrew. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
