On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 16:53 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Thomas J. Baker (tjb@xxxxxxx) said:
> > So what's the thinking on fc6 bling? Why was composite compiled out of
> > metacity as opposed to just using the gconf key? Is it going to be
> > compiz for bling and metacity for no bling? (That's a sad christmas for
> > me because compiz is too buggy compared to metacity on my ATI R250
> > laptop).
>
> Yes, that's the plan going forward.
Also, i think metacity bling was disabled because it linking to libgl
caused all sorts of bad issues with selinux.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc
alexl@xxxxxxxxxx alla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
He's a scarfaced overambitious card sharp on the wrong side of the law. She's
a beautiful out-of-work angel with someone else's memories. They fight crime!
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
